Summit vs Top500.org #1 |
Man-O-War Cay, 16 Nov 2014 | Contact: |
This article talks about a new supercomputer slated for deployment in 2017. I wondered how these new systems might stack up against the field when actually
deployed.
So, here is a plot of the projected "300 peak petaflop/s" (*) of the Summit system in 2017 (the blue diamond) compared with the Top500.org's projected #1 |
![]() |
system performance at that time (the red line).
It is a little uncanny how close Summit's targetted performance is to the Top500.org projected "#1" performance. No doubt not a coincidence.
It is a little uncanny how close Summit's targetted performance is to the Top500.org projected "#1" performance. No doubt not a coincidence.
(*) It looks like Top500.org plots RMAX. The article quoted "peak petaflop/s".

Assuming RPEAK is close to "peak" Flop/s, I have adjusted the 300 "peak petaflop/s" down by 85% in the plot above. Hopefully, better than ignoring it all together. Plotted on a log scale, it doesn't make much difference.